As some of you may know, I've been wrestling with the cover for Crude Sunlight ever since I decided to publish it. On one hand I'm fairly adept at photo manipulation and montage through Photoshop, yet on the other I actually have very little skill in actually creating visual art. Which leaves me able to create striking covers by placing effects on shots, but not actually able to truly create a cover from scratch.
Why has this been a problem? Because Crude Sunlight is a complex, subtle novel. It's a tale of psychological horror set in abandoned buildings in Buffalo, NYC, and thus striking the right tone and creating something that is both visually arresting and conveys the mood of the novel has proved to be a huge headache.
My first attempt was the following:
The idea behind this one was a grungy, dismal wall with rays of golden sunlight splashed across it, hinting perhaps at a sewer grate just above and out of sight, with a subtle splash of blood to indicate that all is not as it should be. However, it lacks a true focal point, and thus ends up looking like a vague, excrement splattered wall.
Not what I was going for.
So I thought: let's ramp this up! Let's get a little dramatic, a little intense, and convey the horror aspect a little more forcefully. The result?
A modern, intense take, but one that overshoots the mark. Gone is the subtlety, replaced instead by a modern, movie poster like feel that misrepresents the novel. This cover lasted but a few days before I reverted, unhappily, to the first.
However! Yesterday I discovered a beautiful shot of an abandoned stairwell online, and after a brief but felicitous exchange with the artist, I received permission to use the shot as my cover. Here it is:
I love it. What do you guys think?



6 comments:
I like it! Although, if you're going to be selling your book somewhere where they only show a thumbnail shot, you might need your name and the title in a larger font. (sorry, removed the previous one due to spelling errors, d'oh!)
8:54 AM
Waaaaaay better than the second one, and substantially better than the first one.
Love love love love love. . . .
The image is good. I think I'd use a different font, though. Not necessarily the full-out gothic of the first cover, but the Tahoma or Skia or whatever that is is just a little... friendly?
@Pippa Jay - Glad you like it! And you're right, which is why I'm going to post an updated version of the cover that addresses this very point...
@William - Thanks amigo!
@Averil - Thanks Averil! Knowing your photographer's eye, I really appreciate the comment!
@Matt - Agreed. Check out the new cover and see if I don't hit the nail on the head.
Post a Comment